> > Thats obscurity, get off this list. You could have posted them anonymously. No, it's called contractual obligation. Some of the stuff would have pointed straight at me... No could do either ethicly or practicly. > > There's just as many people who vehermently object to having full disclosure > as well. If you don't like our service, stop requesting information from > our fileserver. You missed my point entirely, I think. I am pro-disclosure damnit. furthermore, I mailed this like 5 days ago... It only NOW got out, long after the situation had changed. > I don't accept that, you have no proof of that. Only my personal experiences, and what I've seen with other people in the same boat. > You can't stop people with physical access gaining 'r00t'. No, ya really can't. but you can make it hard & audited. > > Stop requesting the little turds from our fileserver then. To save you > getting our crap, we won't be posting advisories to bugtraq in the future. When I posted this, you wern't dealing with thigs with the same resolution level you are now. if the fileservers THE alternative, I'll use it. I still think summary information to the list might be a good deal, but not a large relativly empty report on it in the prior format you'd used. You've missed the point entirely that what I got annoyed with was a change from rock solid useful information to stuff that wsa relativly vaporous. I like what you WERE doing, and am frustrated by your seeming need to backtrack on it. > > Sorry you feel that way, I won't lose any sleep over your worthless comments > Tim. You enjoy getting the same information 5 diffrent times buried in diffrently titled mailings? I don't... but hey diffrent strokes. > > You're not related to Pat are you? No but I guess I can go off on par with him when I get pissed... ;) Tim Scanlon ________________________________________________________________ tfs@vampire.science.gmu.edu Tim Scanlon George mason University Yes, my opinions are tfs@viper.signalcorp.com ALWAYS my own.